Archive for the ‘Issue Advocacy’ Category

Insert clever subject line here (no really, please do!).

by Dionna Humphrey | Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

Ahh, subject lines. A few words, or for some of you A LOT of words, can mean so much. This first introduction between you and your supporters can determine how your email performs, and could impact your overall objectives. And it’s not just what you say, it’s how long it takes you to say it.

I’ve been in the business of advocacy communications a long time. And like all methods of communications, there are some best practices that have been established by experts in the field that you may want to consider adopting.

Spam is not just for breakfast anymore. And spam laws are strict, and the company that provides your CRM is equally as strict about their whitelist status. Most importantly you should be too, since you don’t want your emails to land into a junk folder. “Free”, “Opportunity”, “Act now”, and other ambiguous words can sink your email before you even reach your subscriber. Many CRM providers may have a list of words they recommend you avoid, check with them as a good place to start.

K.I.S.S. (keep it short, silly). The standard for subject lines these days is 50 character max. Remember, this should be something that will make your member want to open your email, not be turned off, overwhelmed or completely bored and delete it before they even read what you have to say. Not to mention in today’s world, people are accessing your emails on their smart phone. And a long subject line will definitely get cut off.

Test, test, test! Part of a successful email marketing program is analyzing your data is a practice you should incorporate into your continual evaluation. If you’re unsure how a subject line will perform, test it. Do an A/B split test (we’ll be blogging on that subject too, stay tuned) on your subject lines, let it run for 24 hours and whatever the winner is, use that subject line for the remainder of your group. It’s always a good idea to see how previous subject lines performed as well. You can test short v. long, straightforward v. ambiguous, etc.

Localize it. If you’re inviting people to an event or you want people to take action on an issue that is close to them, add it to the subject line. Check out Organizing for America, the Humane Society & travel sites like Travelocity to see some good examples of using this information in subject lines.

There are a lot of things to remember when creating a successful email marketing campaign. But do not underestimate the power of a smart and savvy subject line- it can make all the difference. To find out how Amplify Public Affairs can help you create email marketing campaigns that deliver results, visit us online at www.amplifypublicaffairs.net.

3 Fan-Busters Every Organization Should Avoid

by Elena Berger | Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

Don't kiss your fans goodbye.Mashable reported yesterday that John Mayer shut down his Twitter account, leaving 3.7 million followers high and dry. The reason? He was only using Twitter to promote his recent tour; otherwise, he mostly communicates through his blog.

I’m so glad to hear that Mayer is committed to blogging. However, the Mashable folks and I had a very similar reaction to his Twitter reneg: Seriously? You’re never going to have another tour again?

It seems insane to purposefully say goodbye to a fanbase of any size. But strangely enough, I’ve seen lots of advocacy folks doing basically the same thing. Maybe they’re not shutting their accounts down (though some of them are), but they might as well be.

So what’s the fan-busting equivalent of the delete button?

  • Creating Facebook and Twitter accounts for each individual advocacy campaign instead of using one organizational brand to promote multiple campaigns. There are times when this is not true, of course. For example, if the campaign is run by a coalition of organizations, or it’s a long-term project that is significantly different in theme and scope than your organization’s original mission. But what if your project basically boils down to a single action alert, well within bounds? Why not keep your brand–and your fanbase–intact?

  • Creating an account for a brief offshoot campaign before or instead of an organizational account. What happens when that campaign ends? Do you really think your fans will follow you to your website, a different Twitter handle or a more generic Facebook page? Brand as broadly as possible to get the most fans as you can, and then set about categorizing them by interest by which of your action alerts they take.

  • Creating an account for one purpose but then using it for another when you run out of things to say. This is pretty much like the previous example, except you’re taking the new topic to your fans instead of taking your fans to the new topic. Maybe people will stick around, maybe they won’t. I wouldn’t. I don’t like to get spammed on Facebook any more than I like it on email.

Again, there are exceptions to every rule. But advocates are by definition fan-getters. It’s important at least to start with a long-term mindset, trying not to go more specific than you need to so that you don’t wind up “eating your young.” (Sorry for the mental image, but now you’ll never forget my point, right?)

Let’s face it, John Mayer’s concerts will still sell out, so he can probably get away with some bad social media choices. You can’t.

Content is the new (and forever) black

by Elena Berger | Thursday, June 24th, 2010

Yesterday, I had the pleasure of speaking on a panel at a meeting of the Web Content Mavens, a DC networking group focused on web content from many different perspectives. This particular event was a casual overview of web specialties. The discussion revolved around our various web-related job titles, what they mean in real life, and how they integrate with the tasks of the (mostly) content managers and online editors in the audience. The panel talked about everything from user experience and information architecture to social media and communications planning.

The funny thing is, talking about all of our specialties eventually brought us around to a fundamental truth about the online world: As fancy as organizations are now getting, and as many bells and whistles as they are adding to their repetoir, great content is and always will be the core of a great web presence.

Take a website like World Wildlife Foundation (not an Amplify client – I just like their site!). During a time when there are so many issues at play in environmetal news, they manage to promote all of their work and still produce important and well-written content about the Gulf oil spill. Their readers get immediate access to:

  • up-to-date news about the oil spill
  • information about how they can help WWF take action
  • first-hand accounts from organization representatives reporting from the front lines

The updates are timely, and the first person narratives capture the situation in a way that is different from other sources. You can also get great – and somewhat different, for a different audience – information from their Facebook page.

So besides having an attractive site that allows people to find all the things they’re looking for, it’s really their well-written, thoughtfully considered content that sets them apart. In the advocacy world, this is the most basic, crucial thing for you to get right. And all the other stuff – from search engine optimization to Twitter feeds and everything in between – need to be an extension of your great content in order to be truly meaningful.

When I say that content is basic, however, I don’t at all mean that it’s easy. Understanding your audience and finding your voice can be the most difficult things in the world to do, and shouldn’t be taken lightly. That’s why when Amplify’s clients come to us for special projects – ad campaigns, advocacy microsites, social media, videos, etc. – we very often ask them to take a step back with us and first consider what’s already on their site.

By the way, hooray for meetups like the Web Content Mavens for keeping the important stuff in the spotlight.

Can you keep up with political/technical change?

by Jennifer Berk | Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

I’ve mentioned before that one of the big lessons of online campaigning is to budget for continuing web development. Here’s a great example of why you need to do that, from Talking Points Memo:

About two weeks ago, I took a screen-capture of the front page of Crist’s campaign site shortly before he announced his party switch. One element of the site that caught my eye was an image linking to an issues page, which said: “*Consistent Leadership* The Charlie Crist Conservative Record.” This had been a part of his site for some months, in an effort to defend credentials on the right when he was running in the Republican primary against Marco Rubio.

Now the “consistent leadership” remains, but in a slightly different form: “*Consistent Leadership* The Charlie Crist Record.” The word “conservative” has been deleted.

Here is the before picture:

And here is the after picture:

Obviously this is a bit of an unusual circumstance, but this isn’t confined to political upheavals: how fast was your favorite political campaign or advocacy group to implement the new Facebook Like button?

Any advocacy is good advocacy?

by Jennifer Berk | Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Everyone’s heard “any publicity is good publicity.” Does the same apply to activism?

I’m used to seeing Facebook statuses that don’t make sense without context. But the colors were less comprehensible than most. Brigid Schulte on the Washington Post’s Story Lab blog asks:

Was so openly and willingly posting something as intimate as one’s bra color an attempt to raise breast cancer awareness? Or was it all just another Facebook ‘send your friend a snowball’ or ‘take your celebrity boyfriend quiz’ silly game?

Whatever its original purpose was, it did put breast cancer in front of a lot of people. But not everyone was happy about the method:

Some breast cancer survivors blogged about the heart-wrenching decision of whether to post a bra color or not. “I wrote ‘None – in fact, I don’t even OWN one,’” blogged one survivor, who noted that many of her friends who’d had mastectomies began writing “Nude.” “Nothing.”

I’d be irritated with any established organization that created this (they should know to run their messaging by some stakeholders). But no one knows who started it.

This is part of an overall loss of control that affects advocacy organizations as well as brands. They’ll need to figure out what to endorse and what to disavow in order to benefit from activism that doesn’t quite match their own messages, might offend traditional supporters, but spreads through populations they’ve been unable to reach.

Integrated online campaign for World AIDS Day

by Jennifer Berk | Friday, December 4th, 2009

Maybe you can’t convince all the major social media sites to cooperate with your day of action. But if you could, what would it look like?

World AIDS Day answered this question on December 1. The HubSpot marketing blog described the participation from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Flickr, and even Google. Each site let its users participate in spreading AIDS awareness in a way that matched its mission (change your Facebook profile picture, make your tweets display in red, add a picture of a printed sign to a Flickr group…).

So what lessons can you learn from the World AIDS Day social media campaign? Instead of limiting your efforts to one specific site, take advantage of the variety social media offers by spreading your message through multiple channels. Such a multi-faceted social media campaign that elicits the power of multiple sites enables increased visibility and the opportunity to reach a larger audience.

An integrated campaign will reach more supporters and create greater awareness – when you have the time and partners to pull it off.

Twitter grassroots advocacy – SEIU vs act.ly

by Jennifer Berk | Friday, October 23rd, 2009

It’s one thing to just broadcast your campaign messages on Twitter. This is what a grassroots advocacy program on Twitter looks like (from Nancy Scola at Personal Democracy Forum):

But stuffing an auto-retweeting into an advertisement, making the message editable, and then attaching the whole thing to topical blog posts? Not until today, my friend. Over on Daily Kos, SEIU is running ads that encourage would-be tweeters to post a note protesting gender discrimination when it comes to health insurance — such as denying women coverage for pre-existing conditions like providing for the continuation of the species (i.e., pregnancy). Step two is that the pre-packaged tweet also links up to an SEIU online deli-style ticket machine, where people can ‘”take a number” to be counted amongst those opposed to gender discrimination in health care.

Note that

  1. This takes advantage of a built-in characteristic of the platform: the ability to use the website to post a tweet, and therefore to create a link with suggested wording.
  2. Advertising gets the message in front of a sympathetic (and tech-savvy) audience.
  3. The results aren’t visible only on Twitter; there’s an aggregator the campaign controls as well.

So what could be better? Most obviously, the aggregator doesn’t really link to Twitter as well as it could (“it seems to move up a number every time someone clicks on the machine, , not necessarily every time they tweet”), so not everyone who retweets the message and passes it on may be counted.

This is where act.ly excels: creator Jim Gilliam explains, “You sign a petition by tweeting it, and other people can sign the petition just be re-tweeting it.” The tweet is action and word of mouth in one, and the act.ly site takes care of reporting and statistics (and tracking whether the target has responded). Definitely worth a look if you’re planning a Twitter grassroots campaign.

New FTC endorsement guidelines affect bloggers and policy research

by Jennifer Berk | Monday, October 5th, 2009

The FTC’s new blogger endorsement guidelines may change advocacy as well as corporate marketing. The Post Tech blog writes:

A change in the guidelines may also affect lobbyists in Washington: companies will now have to dislcose[sic] their financial ties to studies by research institutes that they fund and cite to promote their positions.

If you blog, if you have a blogger relations program, or if you fund policy research, keep an eye on these guidelines as the FTC begins to enforce them.

CongressCamp and the Effective Efficient Advocacy Mural

by Jennifer Berk | Sunday, September 13th, 2009

I’m at CongressCamp this weekend, discussing how citizens can better communicate with Congress and vice versa. Take a look at the advocacy mural an attendee drew to summarize one session:
advocacy mural

Informative versus cryptic subject lines

by Jennifer Berk | Monday, August 17th, 2009

The standard advice from marketers on email subject lines is to keep them short, but make them informative. MailChimp says “Your subject line should (drum roll please): Describe the subject of your email. Yep, that’s it.” Constant Contact says “Your subject line should convey not just what’s inside your email, but that the contents are important, timely, and relevant.”

But that may not be good advice for advocacy. The Obama campaign made subject lines teasers rather than headlines: “Something extraordinary”, “A beginning”, “You have to see this”, “Results”, “In his own words”. Of course, there was little chance you’d forget what to expect from their emails, given how many they sent. And Politico has talked about the e-mail subject heading war, with PR staffers writing self-consciously clever lines to get reporters to open their emails.

So what should you use? Simple: whatever gets your organization the best results. Test an informative subject, a teaser, a challenge, something personalized, a question, something forwarded…. Pretty much any email system will let you do A/B testing with a fraction of your list and then send the better-performing email to everyone else. Take advantage – you don’t know what will work best for your audiences until you have actual data from their actions.